On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 22:08 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 21:55 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:33 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote:
> > > > > First of all, screw you for all of these patches. Frekin' 80+ emails!
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, sorry. ;) I particularly apologize for 'git send-email' failing
> > > > to properly thread the messages for each series under their summaries.
> > >
> > > Did you invoke 'git send-email' for each series separately? If no then
> > > you should have. If yes then this is definitively a send-email bug.
> >
> > I did it in one line, assuming that it would work as it did when I ran
> > it by hand. We both seem to have expected it to have worked better:
> >
> > for i in $(seq 1 6); do
> > git send-email patches/reg$i \
> > [email protected] \
> > [email protected] \
> > --in-reply-to=1259100144.20337.4503.ca...@localhost
> > done
>
> Your usage of --in-reply-to is wrong. That made all patch series to end
> up in the same thread.
How could I have done it right? Of course, this assumes that sending 6
patche series in reply to a top-level summary is desirable.... Anyway,
here is the relevant output from 'git send-email --help':
--in-reply-to=<identifier>
Specify the contents of the first In-Reply-To header. Subsequent
emails will refer to the previous email instead of this if
--chain-reply-to is set (the default) Only necessary if --compose
is also set. If --compose is not set, this will be prompted for.
It said the "first" header, darn it! I trusted the documentation! :)
Cheers,
Zach
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
