Am 06/06/2011 09:20 AM, schrieb Yegor Yefremov: > Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]> > > --- > tcl/interface/jtagkey2.cfg | 7 ++----- > tcl/interface/jtagkey2p.cfg | 7 ++----- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > Index: b/tcl/interface/jtagkey2.cfg > =================================================================== > --- a/tcl/interface/jtagkey2.cfg > +++ b/tcl/interface/jtagkey2.cfg > @@ -4,8 +4,5 @@ > # http://www.amontec.com/jtagkey2.shtml > # > > -interface ft2232 > -ft2232_device_desc "Amontec JTAGkey-2" > -ft2232_layout jtagkey > -ft2232_vid_pid 0x0403 0xCFF8 > - > +# The JTAGkey2 uses exactly the same config as the JTAGkey. > +source [find interface/jtagkey.cfg] > Index: b/tcl/interface/jtagkey2p.cfg > =================================================================== > --- a/tcl/interface/jtagkey2p.cfg > +++ b/tcl/interface/jtagkey2p.cfg > @@ -4,8 +4,5 @@ > # http://www.amontec.com/jtagkey2p.shtml > # > > -interface ft2232 > -ft2232_device_desc "Amontec JTAGkey-2P" > -ft2232_layout jtagkey > -ft2232_vid_pid 0x0403 0xCFF8 > - > +# The JTAGkey2P uses exactly the same config as the JTAGkey. > +source [find interface/jtagkey.cfg] Hi,
this patch seems to remove the two different ft2232_device_desc strings. Are these unused? If not, I don't understand how this is supposed to work. If the devices really can share one config file, then *one* generic file should remain, and the others should be deleted. cu Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
