Am 06/20/2011 08:14 PM, schrieb Øyvind Harboe: >> Please explain the dangers. > If a driver can't implement a sane feature safely, then the driver shouldn't > implement that feature.... Fine.
I *do* think hardware should be designed in a way that it can not be damaged by software, but if existing hardware has such problems, then the driver needs to protect the hardware and restrict the user from doing something stupid. > One of the reasons I'm not excited about adding the IO features to OpenOCD > is that we have barely enough maintainer resources as is. If a maintainer > came out of the woodwork that would review, design and direct these efforts, > then I wouldn't be in the way. I would dearly like to see SWD done before > opening the floodgates to GPIO and other serial protocols. I can agree to that. However, I do not think we should categorically exclude such extensions on the simple basis that "this should not be done". cu Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
