The best is to standardize at a lower level ... and to forget the idea to have the possibility to bitbang from the TCL of the openocd. > >That's as for the SWD, we have to standardize some function call in the >ft2232, and avoiding bitbang access from higher-level. > >That's not simple to dev, but safe for end-user. > > It is necessary to expose the feature though TCL. Otherwise it is not possible to use it as the telnet TCL interface is the primary (only?) way for you to control OpenOCD. Furthermore, this is the interface to use if you want to use OpenOCD from another program.
I do not understand the opposition to making OpenOCD more flexible by reducing the need to modify the source and re-building to achieve some functionality. You can already do plenty of "unsafe" things with OpenOCD like erasing the entire flash of your target. Phil
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
