On 13/07/2011, at 6:23 AM, Spencer Oliver wrote: > On 12/07/2011 20:56, Peter Stuge wrote: >> Spencer Oliver wrote: >>>> Why are we duplicating effort on two different libraries that >>>> accomplish exactly the same thing? >>> >>> Main reason is that ftd2xx works better/faster on windoze. >> >> Is it known how much, and why? >> >> > > off the top of my head no - the list archive has quite a few threads on this > subject. > > Xiaofan will probably be able to help here.
From memory, I went with ftd2xx rather than ftdi because ftdi wanted to use the old /proc/bus/usb which isn't available on ubuntu. ftd2xx didn't have this problem. Although perhaps that's because I was using the ubuntu version of ftdi... -- µWeb: Embedded Web Framework - http://uweb.workware.net.au/ WorkWare Systems Pty Ltd W: www.workware.net.au P: +61 434 921 300 E: [email protected] F: +61 7 3391 6002 _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
