On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 09:14:46AM -0500, Marc Olivier Chouinard wrote:
> So the project would need someone to take on the management of 0.2 
> release since I know from my end It wont get anywhere soon.  The project 
> is open to all, and should run by itself, but it seem it require daily 
> motivation that I cannot provide ;)

Motivation is brought by Goals, aims, guidelines (not rules), etc.
"Being better than asterisk" is not what i mean, though.  It requires
some "Where do we want to go" (for example architecture wise), it doesnt
make sense to develop just to get the code all thrown over a hill
because it doesnt fit any future architecture.

FWIW, asterisk made some improvements since the fork, but until now i
still find it a big mess.

Also, its nice that anthm(?) started freeswitch and obviously some
people are rather moving there, but i felt lost when i first heard of
freeswitch and iam having thoughts wether freeswitch will make some of
asterisk's mistakes again.


I guess it would be helpful if the commiters to openpbx-svn would say
something about where they want to go and what they want to do, so that
the rest of commiters knows where everyone is standing.


my 2c.

-- 
http://www.ukeer.de/about.html

/* no comment */
_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev

Reply via email to