-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Steve Underwood wrote: >> That snapshot will most probably not work with RxFax/TxFax/chan_fax >> due to some API changes. >> I don't know about the 0.0.2pre25 tho. >> I have updates for the fax-stuff that make them work (i think) with >> the latest snapshots in a branch. I can't test it this week but it >> might be time to merge them. > I cleaned up some old versions on soft-switch.org and went away for a > few days. Looks like I cleaned up a bit too much by mistake. Sorry. > The latest snapshots of spandsp are a much better option than 0.0.3pre5. > T.38 actually kinda works with the latest snapshots. I think there is no > point is reinstating 0.0.3pre5, as it is rather out of date. I will, > however, make a suitable version available at soft-switch.org shortly.
A couple of questions: * The latest snapshots have some changes in the fax api. I think i saw some changes in 0.0.2pre25 too. Are those the same changes? If I adapt chan_fax/?xFax to the latest snapshot will they work with 0.0.2pre25? * Does 0.0.2pre25 have all that is needed for openpbx? What is in the snapshots that is missing from 0.0.2pre25? I'll try to get my chan_fax/?xFax updates merged to trunk tomorrow, so they work with the latest snapshots. Should we add this to 0.2 too, or keep that version dependent on 0.0.3pre5/pre6? /B - -- * GPG-Key: http://evil.gnarf.org/mrbk.pgp A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text? - -- http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEG+9sckvkFeO3ANARAlzdAJ0ZVIXwT6qPWU8L23U5zEMe8EV3KACeM9SK u7EN3TXnPNdsBvdZ91SKG/g= =pAy9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
