Bartek Kania wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Steve Underwood wrote: > > >>>That snapshot will most probably not work with RxFax/TxFax/chan_fax >>>due to some API changes. >>>I don't know about the 0.0.2pre25 tho. >>>I have updates for the fax-stuff that make them work (i think) with >>>the latest snapshots in a branch. I can't test it this week but it >>>might be time to merge them. >>> >>> >>I cleaned up some old versions on soft-switch.org and went away for a >>few days. Looks like I cleaned up a bit too much by mistake. Sorry. >>The latest snapshots of spandsp are a much better option than 0.0.3pre5. >>T.38 actually kinda works with the latest snapshots. I think there is no >>point is reinstating 0.0.3pre5, as it is rather out of date. I will, >>however, make a suitable version available at soft-switch.org shortly. >> >> > >A couple of questions: >* The latest snapshots have some changes in the fax api. > I think i saw some changes in 0.0.2pre25 too. Are those the same changes? > If I adapt chan_fax/?xFax to the latest snapshot will they work with > 0.0.2pre25? > >* Does 0.0.2pre25 have all that is needed for openpbx? > What is in the snapshots that is missing from 0.0.2pre25? > >I'll try to get my chan_fax/?xFax updates merged to trunk tomorrow, so >they work with the latest snapshots. >Should we add this to 0.2 too, or keep that version dependent on >0.0.3pre5/pre6? > > 0.0.2pre25 does not work with openpbx. You need the 0.0.3prexxx series, which have all the API changes to support T.38. I don't remember any API changes between 0.0.3pre5 and now which would matter for openpbx.
Regards, Steve _______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
