Your right that there were some problem with trac and I apologized for svn access problems. Step was taken to setup a dedicated server for the openpbx project. And different people who want to help out in the management of the different aspect of hosting the project are welcome to propose them self like said in my previous post.
I am surprised that there has not been much reply to this discussion. It everyone chances to give input, to propose to everyone their view views and ideas. Some did that is great, but I would have expected some people to also voice their issues. We do need to form a group that define standards and decide what direction we are heading. And THIS is the time and place to make you heard. Mailing list is the best place since it is available 24hours/day 7day a week. This way, there is no reason someone is not aware of what is going on or didn't had the opportunity to get their idea and comments heard by the group. After over 1 year, the project is been running, some users has showed dedicated presences and support, and I thanks you all for your time and support. It just beginning it. Now.... Reply to these threads with your comments please. Thanks Marc O. Chouinard Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > Hi all > > Lately, there have been some talks about a name change, and some have > suggested this to add funding to the project. This is all well, but > there has also been talks of someone initiating a takeover for > reasons unknown or untold. There were arguments about the lack of > stability of trac, and I myself was pretty pissed off for not getting > the svn account I was promised. Currently, though, I don't see these > problems. > > Personally, I beleive in this project. We have a pretty stable > codebase and enough functionality/features. What we need now, is a > open and democratic organization to deal with what should go in and > what should not. In case we get funding, a commitee should decide > what should be prioritised. We also need guidelines for everything > from coding standards to project goals. > > I beleive this is quite similar to what moc proposed to the list > january 24, and this should not be recognised as an opposition to the > proposal of his. > > roy > --- > I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! > > Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openpbx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev > _______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
