Marc Olivier Chouinard wrote: > I am surprised that there has not been much reply to this discussion. > It everyone chances to > give input, to propose to everyone their view views and ideas.
Ok, you want comments. I have posted three versions of my zaptel configure fix patch and haven't received one comment on it in review. I want faster response from the developers for possible fixes. The name change should be done *now*. Not later. The longer the openpbx.org name stays around, the more the project will be identified by that name. Name changes take some time to sink in, especially for people who haven't been keeping track of opbx closely. As for delegation, have people given control of the parts they are interested in and the rest should be governed by all of the developers as a whole. This way there aren't any parts "dumped" on one developer they are not interested in, and the parts that are not delegated can easily be delegated to others because there is no question if any other developer wants that portion. They would already have the parts they want. As for svn, keep it and use https instead of ssh for access. svn with https is easier to use and just as secure. svk is an option if any developer wants a local copy of the code to do private commits on a laptop while offline. As for trac, allow anon to create tickets, but require accounts for wiki changes. trac accounts can be merged with other accounts but it is more important to get new trac accounts working now, not later. Also I've never liked it where there are multiple wikis. Use the trac wiki, it can include references to code and is more useful than a normal wiki because of that. My general opinion is to do whatever it takes to allow people to work *now* and not letting "perfect" get in the way of "good enough for now". P.S. As to the release, where are the known problems listed? Mike _______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
