It seemed at first we were more focused with a core group that discussed matters. Sure some of those haven't been as active as of late but that's the native of FOSS. I think one of the real weaknesses will be getting everyone on the same page to work toward a common goal. Sure given the diverse and talented group we have involved the time zones is also a factor. The project itself needs to set core goals to achieve. Perhaps even bounty major efforts that really will set us apart from just being a fork. NConference is an example of the effort that can be made to address a need. Is anything without bugs? No of course not but if we appear more organized with set goals and progress it will be easier to have more people want to see what we are doing and even contribute. Even so without proper planning in place of how things will work such as patch submission SVN access what makes a release and what is held out etc. And of course evil end user documentation.
As far as the name goes due to issues that benjk and others have brought up it might be a good move to start a new from the base of what we've done thus far but then it becomes and issue to what to name it. I applaud the efforts those involved has made and I've got to know some very talented people thru this project even some that aren't as active as they once were but they still lurk in the shadows. It has been and will be an unhill struggle given the nature of our project goal with the facts that are against us. But one thing that does work for us is many of us would be making code changes to our installs anyway to correct issues that we've notice and atleast now it's possible to get them committed to a source tree and rolled into the next release. -- William IRC: wsuff on FreeNode
_______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
