Since we know what the licensing will cost and that there is enough
"interest" to support the costs, what remains is to:
1. Select a technology
2. Figure out how to control licensing
3. Build a legal structure that will satisfy Sipro, Lucent, NEC and Nokia
I have my lawyers investigating #3 and I'm currently tackling #1. I'm
pretty sure we need to figure out which technology we're going to use
before we land on how to control license distribution.
Below are the solutions I've tested so far. My testing has not been
particularly scientific. I've merely caused the system to load up with
"live" calls, including myself in one or more of the calls (listening
for quality), and monitoring CPU utilization (looking for an upper limit
of 70% on a single processor AMD duo core). Relative to transcoding,
most of the calls were g.711/g.729.
ZettaServe solution (thank you Craig):
This is an Intel IPP 5 based solution.
It clearly works.
I've found no incompatibilities.
I was able to process 200 simultaneous transcoded calls.
ReadyTechnology solutions (thank you Sam):
This is an Intel IPP 4 based solution.
It works.
It also has g.723 properties that were interesting.
I was able to get 163 simultaneous g.729 transcoded calls.
I was able to get 144 simulatneous g.723 transcoded calls (g.729/g.723).
If there is more "scientific" approach y'all would like to see, please
advise your parameters and I'll see what I can do to report on them.
I would like to "test" other solutions as well. There have been several
"off-line" posts suggesting various solutions. While options are
good... I really want to select the "best-of-breed".
_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
