On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:04:48PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote: > > > openssl-0.9.7e-2.3.0 UPDATE openssl-0.9.7e-2.3.1
> > So what is 'initially' ? How did you install 2.3.0 ? > > Initially, is just the first time I run it. Then the second it returns > the next results. The output (which is from build -s) says you already have 2.3.0 installed and the index contains the version 2.3.1. as an update. So how did you install openssl-0.9.7e-2.3.0 ? The first time a 'build -s' would return something like: openssl ADD openssl-0.9.7e-2.3.1 and a simple 'build openssl' returns something like: echo :::: ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.3/UPD/openssl-0.9.7e-2.3.1.src.rpm :::: /usr/local/openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm --rebuild ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.3/UPD/openssl-0.9.7e-2.3.1.src.rpm || exit $? /usr/local/openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm -Uvh /usr/local/openpkg/RPM/PKG/openssl-0.9.7e-2.3.1.ix86-netbsd2.0-ulo.rpm || exit $? echo :::: ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.3/UPD/openssl-0.9.7e-2.3.1.src.rpm = $? :::: > > Do you install directly from ftp.openpkg.org ? > > No, I rsync my own local copy of the src rpms This at least rules out intermittent problem with the index. BTW, what perl is used when you run the build tool ? -- Michael van Elst Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree." ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
