It seems that the fixes that were put into place have resolved the issues I was seeing now. Thank you. We can now commence with total world domination!!! Muhahahaha! ;-)
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 08:05 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005, Michael van Elst wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:39:05PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote: > > > > > Haha. I was wondering about that when I was doing it. Ok, well, here > > > is the debug from the -a -U then. However, it still seemed to have an > > > issue. > > > > Ok. The bug is far away from what I thought. > > > > The problem was that a requirement for a package option (such as > > openssl::with_threads) is matched by multiple packages (i.e. > > version 2.3.0 and 2.3.1) and then sorted by the option value > > instead of by the package version to select a 'best' choice. > > > > Since the option value in this case is the default value > > it is 'no' vs 'no' and the result depends on the internal > > perl hash function, i.e. it is random and machine dependent. > > > > Fixing this required some bigger changes, so I need more > > testing time. > > I've rolled your last two fixes to "openpkg build" into the new > OpenPKG-CURRENT package openpkg-tools-0.8.34-20050324. This way people > can test your changes easily... > > Ralf S. Engelschall > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.engelschall.com > > ______________________________________________________________________ > The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org > Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org > -- David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
