On Thu, Mar 24, 2005, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:39:05PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > Haha. I was wondering about that when I was doing it. Ok, well, here
> > is the debug from the -a -U then. However, it still seemed to have an
> > issue.
>
> Ok. The bug is far away from what I thought.
>
> The problem was that a requirement for a package option (such as
> openssl::with_threads) is matched by multiple packages (i.e.
> version 2.3.0 and 2.3.1) and then sorted by the option value
> instead of by the package version to select a 'best' choice.
>
> Since the option value in this case is the default value
> it is 'no' vs 'no' and the result depends on the internal
> perl hash function, i.e. it is random and machine dependent.
>
> Fixing this required some bigger changes, so I need more
> testing time.
I've rolled your last two fixes to "openpkg build" into the new
OpenPKG-CURRENT package openpkg-tools-0.8.34-20050324. This way people
can test your changes easily...
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
