On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 18:16 +0000, Jeremy Bennett wrote: > Another thought while we are changing the target name. Should we take > the opportunity to make the target or1k-linux-uclibc, to give us space > to have an or1k-linux-glibc target (which I believe someone is working > on)?
It's already or1k-*-linux* Who's working on glibc? /Jonas _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
