On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:04 +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 18:16 +0000, Jeremy Bennett wrote: > > Another thought while we are changing the target name. Should we take > > the opportunity to make the target or1k-linux-uclibc, to give us space > > to have an or1k-linux-glibc target (which I believe someone is working > > on)? > > It's already or1k-*-linux* > > Who's working on glibc?
I thought you had proposed replacing uClibc? Someone certainly talked about using glibc as that replacement, but there are other possibilities. You are correct the patterns match. I was proposing tightening the match to make it easier to implement alternatives in the future. Jeremy -- Tel: +44 (1590) 610184 Cell: +44 (7970) 676050 SkypeID: jeremybennett Email: [email protected] Web: www.embecosm.com _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
