On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 08:50 +0000, Jeremy Bennett wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:04 +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 18:16 +0000, Jeremy Bennett wrote: > > > Another thought while we are changing the target name. Should we take > > > the opportunity to make the target or1k-linux-uclibc, to give us space > > > to have an or1k-linux-glibc target (which I believe someone is working > > > on)? > > > > It's already or1k-*-linux* > > > > Who's working on glibc? > > I thought you had proposed replacing uClibc? Someone certainly talked > about using glibc as that replacement, but there are other > possibilities.
Bionic is obviously the future... You don't need to be more specific than linux* because their "standard libs" are all the compatible. The "-uclibc", "-bionic", "-klibc" appendages are really just for clarity. And "-glibc" is never used because "or1k-linux" implies "-glibc"... but I'm sure you knew that. /Jonas _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
