On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Julius Baxter <[email protected]> wrote: > The lwz and lws should do the same thing on 32-bit. We stuck to lwz in > RTL and software for historical reasons. I think we should make the > implementations work for both of these. > > We could also add l.lw as an instruction mnemonic for 32-bit > implementations which is assembled as l.lwz. Perhaps this is something > we could capture in the architecture specification update (in the > mnemonic examples for l.lwz and l.lws)
+1. And by the way, my or1k-src tree has much of the work towards a 64-bit version of the toolchain already done, if anyone is interested. It wouldn't take much work to get a 64-bit assembler, linker, and simulator. -Pete _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
