On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Julius Baxter <[email protected]> wrote: > > I looked at the attendance sheet recently too, and noticed we hadn't > attracted too much attention yet. However, I suspect there's several > people who will be coming along who haven't registered interest yet > (people who live and work in and around Stockholm.) >
I didn't even get that the attendance sheet proposed in this thread got "official" until looking at the wiki-page. > It may make some sense to have the OpenRISC meetup in Gothenburg > during FSCONS. However I'd still like to have a full day's worth of > sessions to go over OpenRISC-related topics at a separate event, and > it looks like we have plenty of proposals for presentations and > discussions for the Stockholm date already. > >> >> I can check with Jeremiah how much time we could be allocated for >> presentations at the conference, but I think we need to decide quite >> soon, as the deadline seems to be approaching fast. > > As FSCONS is about a month after the proposed Stockholm meeting, how > about some sort of follow up or continuation of the proposed October > meeting? Basically, meetup round 2, and depending on who's going we > could ask for a room for as long as we'd need to hold the handful of > presentations we might get, and to (begin, at least) any form > discussion we may want to have, before heading to the pub. I suspect > we'd get a fairly different group of people to both, who can only go > to either, so why not just do both? Hopefully all sessions will be > recorded so those who didn't get to the other can still see what went > down. > I agree with Julius here, I don't see a reason why we can't do both. (and personally, my calender is clear for the Stockholm date, but even if I'd very much want to attend to FSCONS, I'm not at all sure about November). Stefan _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
