>> Otherwise, as long as it passes the test suite that should be fine. I >> guess it should live in a branch until the re-branded or1k tool chain >> becomes the norm. Hopefully that's pretty soon, though. > > Hopefully :) Stefan is doing an awesome job with the PIC stuff. But > I think as long as it compiles the linux kernel and busybox, it's > pretty close to where it was before, right? >
The most important thing missing for me in the or1k toolchain is gdb. Anyone around with too much spare time who wants to look at that? :) -- Olof Kindgren ______________________________________________ ORSoC Website: www.orsoc.se Email: [email protected] ______________________________________________ FPGA, ASIC, DSP - embedded SoC design _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
