Hi Gary, one query inline with [Praveen]
Thanks, Praveen On 13-Oct-16 4:20 AM, Gary Lee wrote: > osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc | 8 ++------ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > After SC absence, active amfd will reject messages from 'veteran' amfnds until > its local amfnd has started. During this period, if a PG track action msg > is sent and rejected by amfd, it will cause the sending amfnd to lose sync [Praveen] I think here "lose sync" means it will cause message id mismatch later. > with amfd. So we should also queue this message to be re-sent. > > diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc > b/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc > --- a/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc > +++ b/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc > @@ -1033,12 +1033,8 @@ uint32_t avnd_di_msg_send(AVND_CB *cb, A > if (!msg) > goto done; > > - /* Verify Ack nack and PG track action msgs are not buffered */ > - if (m_AVSV_N2D_MSG_IS_PG_TRACK_ACT(msg->info.avd)) { > - /*send the response to AvD */ > - rc = avnd_mds_send(cb, msg, &cb->avd_dest, 0); > - goto done; > - } else if (m_AVSV_N2D_MSG_IS_VER_ACK_NACK(msg->info.avd)) { > + /* Verify Ack nack msgs are not buffered */ > + if (m_AVSV_N2D_MSG_IS_VER_ACK_NACK(msg->info.avd)) { > /*send the response to active AvD (In case MDS has not updated > its > tables by this time) */ > TRACE_1("%s, Active AVD Adest: %" PRIu64, __FUNCTION__, > cb->active_avd_adest); > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel