Hi Gary,
one query inline with [Praveen]
Thanks,
Praveen
On 13-Oct-16 4:20 AM, Gary Lee wrote:
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc | 8 ++------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>
> After SC absence, active amfd will reject messages from 'veteran' amfnds until
> its local amfnd has started. During this period, if a PG track action msg
> is sent and rejected by amfd, it will cause the sending amfnd to lose sync
[Praveen] I think here "lose sync" means it will cause message id
mismatch later.
> with amfd. So we should also queue this message to be re-sent.
>
> diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc
> b/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc
> --- a/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc
> +++ b/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc
> @@ -1033,12 +1033,8 @@ uint32_t avnd_di_msg_send(AVND_CB *cb, A
> if (!msg)
> goto done;
>
> - /* Verify Ack nack and PG track action msgs are not buffered */
> - if (m_AVSV_N2D_MSG_IS_PG_TRACK_ACT(msg->info.avd)) {
> - /*send the response to AvD */
> - rc = avnd_mds_send(cb, msg, &cb->avd_dest, 0);
> - goto done;
> - } else if (m_AVSV_N2D_MSG_IS_VER_ACK_NACK(msg->info.avd)) {
> + /* Verify Ack nack msgs are not buffered */
> + if (m_AVSV_N2D_MSG_IS_VER_ACK_NACK(msg->info.avd)) {
> /*send the response to active AvD (In case MDS has not updated
> its
> tables by this time) */
> TRACE_1("%s, Active AVD Adest: %" PRIu64, __FUNCTION__,
> cb->active_avd_adest);
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
