On Friday 25 May 2007 12:46 pm, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > On Friday 25 May 2007 18:34:51 Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > > Why is "Generic CCID Reader" used instead of the real reader name? > > a mix of a) historic - for some reason we had that already, don't know why. > and b) I was too lazy today to fix it and enter the names. but the list > reflects openct.conf, and at some point I started adding comments to each > device. > > do you have a list of all the readers you have with name, vendor and > product id? guess you know a lot more ccid readers than we :) > > also is there any way to use the smart card interface class in the info > file instead of listing each product id? might be a lot easier.
Isn't the point of generic USB devices that you don't need a weird table like this? A CCID driver should be capable with past and /future/ devices that implement the spec. So even if you have a name mapping for present devices, there will always be new devices that won't have a name mapping. Also, can't the product name be queried through the USB or CCID protocol? -Justin _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
