On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 01:03:18PM -0700, Justin Karneges wrote: > Isn't the point of generic USB devices that you don't need a weird > table like this?
Indeed. > A CCID driver should be capable with past and /future/ devices that > implement the spec. So even if you have a name mapping for present > devices, there will always be new devices that won't have a name > mapping. All USB device interfaces that have bInterfaceClass set to 0x0b are CCID devices. > Also, can't the product name be queried through the USB or CCID > protocol? Not always. The product identification strings are optional in USB devices. Not all device implement them. Some that do just put generic nonsense in them. //Peter _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
