Hi Carsten,
Carsten Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> before you start screaming at me, because of the subject line, please
> let me explain the issues:
> 1) AFAICS the current implementation writes the AttachmentMap without
> binding information and hence is not able to handle multiple attachments
> with the same group id on a single container.
That's a bug that needs to be fixed, and for that changes can't be avoided
anyway.
> 2) Ptr mfields write size information twice, once as the binary size of
> the field and then as the number of elements in the field.
Seems to be minor enough to not worry about it, IMHO...
> These changes will make the OSB format identical to what is transmitted
> in the cluster, because for writing the copyToBin methods can be used,
> instead of custom code (for reading custom code can not be avoided).
> This will simplify the generic parts of OSB i/o.
...but that makes it absolutely worthwhile.
> Loading of 1.x OSB files will still be supported, but since there was no
> release of 2 I don't think we need to support the current format.
Fine with me, please go ahead and do it.
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
