Hi Lars,
On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 08:30, Lars Hillebrand wrote:
> Hi
>
> I managed to divide the build of my datastrukture into two steps without
> runtime-overhead, so i can determine the size of each tree-level and
> then allocate all memory i need using "resize". In addition i replaced
> every "push_back" with "setValue", but the memory-consumtion is stil the
> same!
That's weird indeed, as the osb file generally is just a disc image of
the memory used by the internal data structures, so if that is
significantly smaller there is something weird going on.
Would you be willing to send us a snapshot of your current code to see
what's happening?
Thanks
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
