Hi Bjoern,
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 12:16, Björn Harmen Gerth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't understand why this belongs into the material.
> I think each type of NodeCore should decide whether it
> wants to have 0 or 1+ materials.
IMHO, because it's a Material issue. Essentially you still only have
logical Material, it's just composed of multiple passes with simpler
Materials. If you put that into the Node, all the different drawing
nodes have to be changed to accommodate it. If you put it into the
Material, they don't, they just continue working.
> Does that mean that the functor stuff (and how
> MaterialDrawable works) is going to change in the
> not-so-far future?
The core idea will stay the same, some details will change. The
complication right now is that the RenderAction expects to get a
Material that returns a single State, and that wouldn't be true for a
MultiMaterial.
Hope it helps
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op�ick
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
