--- Andreas Zieringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Interesting point but if I'm not wrong I think it is
> correct to
> increment the reference counter for the parent
> nodes. The new deep
> cloned core references the new deep cloned node.
Well, I thought every NodeCore will be deepcloned and
every field of that core and every field of that
field...
> This problem is already fixed in the upcoming OpenSG
> 2.0 release :-) We
> will realease quite soon OpenSG 1.6 with new
> features and bugfixes.
> First 2.0 betas are expected to Siggraph in August.
What exactly does that mean? The complete problem I
have is already solved?
And what is the next release? 1.6 or 2.0?
If 1.6 is the next release, does that mean 1.6 comes
out before August?
Are all those features and bugfixes in the current
CVS?
Björn
___________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden:
http://mail.yahoo.de
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
