Hi Björn,
--- Andreas Zieringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Interesting point but if I'm not wrong I think it is
correct to
increment the reference counter for the parent
nodes. The new deep
cloned core references the new deep cloned node.
Well, I thought every NodeCore will be deepcloned and
every field of that core and every field of that
field...
Yes that's the way how it works, perhaps I don't get the problem.
This problem is already fixed in the upcoming OpenSG
2.0 release :-) We
will realease quite soon OpenSG 1.6 with new
features and bugfixes.
First 2.0 betas are expected to Siggraph in August.
What exactly does that mean? The complete problem I
have is already solved?
Well I think so, but Gerrit made all the FieldContainer changes for the
2.0 perhaps he can comment on this.
And what is the next release? 1.6 or 2.0?
1.6
If 1.6 is the next release, does that mean 1.6 comes
out before August?
Yes in April or Mai.
Are all those features and bugfixes in the current
CVS?
Yes most of it. We are going to focus our work now on the 2.0.
Andreas
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
