from glancing over it libxml2 looks fine as it has the SAX interface I'm
mainly interested in. So it might be easier for us (me) to change to
libxml2.
my 2 cent:
we are already using libxml2 [1] and the c++ wrapper [2] for DOM
(read/write) and SAX parsing in several projects, so my preference
is clear ;)
i used it only for xml files up to ~150 mb (sax) and there were no
abnormal loading times. but for collada we're expecting file sizes
10-100 times as large, i suppose.
regards,
simon
[1] http://www.xmlsoft.org/
[2] http://libxmlplusplus.sourceforge.net
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
