Carsten Neumann wrote: >Allen Bierbaum wrote: > > >>>- IIUC you also want the things in ContainerPool to be written to OSB >>>when saving your scene, right ? If yes, how did you plan to attach it to >>>the graph ? The MaterialPool in 1.x is a NodeCore which solves this >>>problem - there might be better solutions, but this one is easy and gets >>>the job done - the rest is to some extend a matter of taste. >>> >>> >>> >>I was hoping or expecting that any attached field containers would also >>be written out and loaded. I haven't checked the loader yet though to >>make sure this is supported. >> >> > >Ah, so you want ContainerPool to be an Attachment ? >FieldContainerAttachment is the base class you probably want then. >And Attachments are written out (in theory at least ;) ), e.g, the >NameAttachment. >Otherwise this is the point I was trying to get at: How do you intend to >attach ContainerPool to the graph ? > > By attaching it to a node. I still need to test this....
-Allen > Carsten > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your >opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash >http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >_______________________________________________ >Opensg-users mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
