Hi,
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:38 +0100, Carsten Neumann wrote: > Hi Gerrit, > > yes, it does. Actually it looks strange either way, but I think I just > understood the idea. The dynamically added fields are supposed to be at > index 0,1,... of the vector _dynFieldsV and the code assumed that > _localType.addDescription returns an index >= Inherited::NextFieldId so > the "-" was used to shift that index. But _localType does not know about > the inherited fields and thus returns indices starting from 0 (or maybe > 1 -- didn't check that part). that is the main problem. _localtype should know about all the fields and than the - makes sense (as it did in 1.8). I should be able to fix this later today. But the whole thing will not work with aspects and the cluster part right now. So the added fields will stay local. This it, I guess, why it was not finished. > So maybe the real problem is that the DynamicAttachment needs two type > objects (one per type like any other fc and the per instance one) where > the per instance one "extends" the per type one. What would we the best > way to achieve that ? it needs the two type objects but this is only a minor part of the problem. regards, gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
