Cristina Videira Lopes wrote: > On second thoughts, maybe what you mean is that now that the HG is out > there, there is a lot less need for the configuration of a grided region > having a local asset DB? People who want to keep their assets under > their control but be able to interact with other people, can now do it > via HG.
Yes, that's what I meant. The last sentence was misleading. > > Cristina Videira Lopes wrote: >> Justin Clark-Casey wrote: >> >>> But it strikes me that now, if you wanted to retain your regions assets >>> locally, you could set up your region as a >>> hypergrid enabled region, as Hypergrid regions use the local asset store >>> (there is conceptually no global). >>> >>> In view of this, I'd like to completely remove the asset_database option. >>> This would mean that in standalone and >>> hypergrid modes, the db used would always be local and in grid mode the >>> grid asset service would always be used. >>> >>> Are there any objections to this? >>> >>> >> I don't understand enough of the asset_database issue, but what you say >> here is not entirely correct. Hypergrid regions can be in grid mode too. >> I have several HG regions connected to OSGrid, and all of the regions in >> the UCI Grid are HG-ed. They're all configured with asset_database = "grid". >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensim-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Opensim-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev -- justincc Justin Clark-Casey http://justincc.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
