+1

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dahlia Trimble
Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 2009 3:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] 23 LSL functions remaining

I don't think 100% compatibility is possible given some of the quirks of the 
LSL language, and differences between the LSL2 and mono implementations that 
exist on the Linden grid. There will always be some differences. I also don't 
believe that many of the OpenSim developers see 100% SL compatibility as a goal 
for OpenSim. Rather, the SL viewer has been the first viewer used for 
development. As OpenSim continues to be developed and support for new viewers 
and protocols are added, there will likely be substantial divergence from the 
SL path.
Of course if members of the user community submit acceptable patches which 
provide increased compatibility, they will likely be included into the code 
base.


On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Colin B. Withers 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
There is also the question of compatibility with LSL. Questions have been 
raised about whether Opensim can be used as a development tool for SL. Here is 
one thread that calls compatibility into question:

http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/opensim-discussion/26340-opensim-compatibility-place-develop-secondlife.html

Is the aim to have 100% compatibilty, so that scripts developed in Opensim will 
be guaranteed to work in SL, and vice versa? As the old saying goes, you cannot 
be a little bit pregnant, it is either 100% or nothing.

Rock


________________________________________
From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
[[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of Charles Krinke [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: 12 May 2009 04:25
To: opensim-dev
Subject: [Opensim-dev] 23 LSL functions remaining

I am asking for a few patches to complete the 23 LSL functions in our original 
project of more then 330. We are *almost* there, but need a little help with 
patches. Here is the remaining list that are still in the "Not Implemented" 
state.

llRotTarget()
llRotTargetRemove()
llLoopSoundMaster()
llLoopSoundSlave()
llStopLookAt()
llCollisionFilter()
llAttachToAvatar()
llDetachFromAvatar()
llRotLookAt()
llPointAt()
llStopPointAt()
llGodLikeRezObject()
llPassTouches()
llSetDamage()
llTextBox()
llCollisionSprite()
llPassCollisions()
llGetCenterOfMass()
llSetSoundQueing()
llTriggerSoundLimited()
llGroundRepel()
llSetVehicleFlags()
llRemoveVehicleFlags()
llRemoteDataSetRegion()
llSetInventoryPermMask()

Partial implementations are solicited. The goal here is to get all the LSL 
functions we have defined in LSL_Api.cs out of the not implemented state with 
at least *some* implementation.

Charles
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev

_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev

Reply via email to