Sure you're right ... let's go to "git" then :) But, is it possible to change the "OpenSim Commits" posts ? Really, it's un-useful and unreadable ...
Regards, Ursula. > Ursula MATOVA wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Just my comment on the use of "git" instead of "svn" ... >> ... Was so simple for us ( "non - core-devs" ) when it was on subversion >> ... >> >> I've read the git documentation, and sure many many feature are >> interresting for active core-devs, but ... >> >> - The details posted on OpenSim Commits list are so uggly, and >> unreadable ... Was really better before, the diffs were included in the >> mail ... was helpful, because we were able to see what has changed in a >> commit, the post "Subject" isn't clear at all ( maybe it's because the >> transition between svn & git is not finished yet ), >> - About, "revisions" ... now, it's impossible to know what release >> number is "current" ... >> (( As somebody mentioned here, all my scripts performing an automatic >> upgrade are now broken :( )) >> >> Anyway, that doesn't change the quality of the work done :D >> ... that will only make our task harder to maintain our opensim servers ... >> >> The only thing is that "svn" if more "user-friendly" than "git", >> > > as somehow who has suffered from the many many quirks of svn --- and was a > firm > disbeliever in git when sean "evangelized" it in the IBM opensim community way > back when --- i've since come to LOVE git. sure it's different (but then cars > are different to horse-drawn coaches :-) and, yes, i can sympathize with the > "release naming issue" --- but i've to say, it's much more user friendly > because > i as a user of it have considerable less problems with it and have in fact > more > freedom to work MY workflow instead of having to bow to SVN. > > just my CHF 0.02 ;-) > > cheers, > drs/dirk > > _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
