Wow, has there been a single discussion of features in OpenSim in the past year that hasn’t devolved into insults and argument? I would think that encouraging differing opinions begin expressed would be encouraged instead of suppressed… sigh.
Frank > On May 26, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Mike Chase <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I did say it was my opinion. I'll save you the trouble and remove myself. > As to whether what I said is unfounded people can form their own opinions. > Yours is an opinion as well. The OpenSim team has taken your fair share of > pot-shots at other efforts in the past. Diva's comments about InWorldz > (which I do contribute to) were also "unfounded". Mostly I think its a shame > the project is in the state its in. > > Best wishes, really. I care deeply about VW tech and would like to see it > land in a good place. > > Mike > > On 5/26/15 1:42 PM, Michael Emory Cerquoni wrote: >> Mike your comments are completely unfounded please refrain from that kind of >> stuff here, it is not helpful and is simply your opinion and not based at >> all in fact or reality, if you prefer Whitecore that is fine by all means >> use it, but please do not use this mailing list to spread misinformation or >> I will have you permanently removed from the list. >> >> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mike Chase >> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Flyman, since you are a commiter on WhiteCore, why not point him there since >> its the continuation of the work Rev was doing. >> >> https://github.com/WhiteCoreSim/WhiteCore-Dev >> <https://github.com/WhiteCoreSim/WhiteCore-Dev> >> >> Honestly I prefer WhiteCore to vanilla OpenSim anyway. OpenSim is slowly >> dieing (IMO) from neglect anyway. And attempts to improve it seem to >> generate more argument than progress. >> >> Mike >> >> >> On 5/26/15 8:24 AM, Fly Man wrote: >>> Talun, why would you want to use the aaFunction from AuroraSim when it's no >>> longer being developed ?? >>> >>> 1) AuroraSim died when the main developer went missing >>> >>> 2) Most of the aaFunctions are based on parts that aren't in OpenSim for >>> obvious reasons. >>> >>> So, I would -1 for including any functions that are specific for a fork of >>> OpenSim (which was branched of an older version of OpenSim) >>> >>> 2015-05-24 0:47 GMT+02:00 W Smith <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >>> Hi all, is it acceptable to take code from forks of OpenSim? >>> >>> My specific desire is to take some of the lsl functions code from >>> Aurora-Sim and make them compatible with and work in OpenSim >>> >>> Regards Talun. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Opensim-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev >>> <http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Opensim-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev >>> <http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensim-dev mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev >> <http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Michael Emory Cerquoni >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensim-dev mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev >> <http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev> > > _______________________________________________ > Opensim-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
