Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I don't know if its this case or not. I derailed it, and case > materials need to be supplied. The idea that we could "fix" some of > the 32-bit performance problems, or offer an optional 64-bit only > distro, certainly has a certain amount of appeal.
Its not this case or any other case we should/could create. (Except at the very, low extreme) We review projects proposed by project teams. We can suggest in Advice that such a project team should be formed. We can not dictate that projects be created [1]. BTW: What is "an optional ... distro"? - jek3 [1] I remember that the ARCs have made the statement "we will not approve any projects in this specific area until XXX is fixed". The biggest one I remember was an LDAP disaster Solaris had about a decade ago, but this is far from the general case and completely inappropriate for this **marketing** decision.
