On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 16:24 -0700, Mike Oliver wrote: > Irene Huang wrote:
> >> ... > >> 4.2. Interfaces: > >> Exported Interfaces > >> Interface Classification Comments > >> --------------- -------------- > >> ----------------------- > >> ... > >> /usr/lib/libtasn1.so Volatile Shared library > >> ... > > Why is this library not versioned in the usual manner? (E.g. > libtasn1.so.1, accompanied by a .so symlink pointing to the > "current" version for use by the normal linker environment.) Sorry, this is my mistake. /usr/lib/libtasn1.so Volatile Symbolic link /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3 Volatile Symbolic link /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3.0.15 Volatile Shared library Spec will be changed accordingly. > > I don't know whether there's a SAC Best Practice for bringing > the license terms of libraries to the notice of developers who > might wish to use those libraries. AFAICT this one is LGPL; > does that need to be mentioned anywhere? I'll mention that in libtasn1 man page. Thanks Jeff > > Mike.
