Hi, Mike if you are OK with the license indicated in the copyright file, please let me know and I would like to close this case as approved.
Thanks --Irene Irene Huang wrote: > Generally, we don't include license information in the manpage. For > Opensolaris project, we ship a copyright file in each package, I think > that will do. > > --Irene > On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:10 +0800, Jeff Cai wrote: > >> On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 16:24 -0700, Mike Oliver wrote: >> >>> Irene Huang wrote: >>> >>>>> ... >>>>> 4.2. Interfaces: >>>>> Exported Interfaces >>>>> Interface Classification Comments >>>>> --------------- -------------- >>>>> ----------------------- >>>>> ... >>>>> /usr/lib/libtasn1.so Volatile Shared >>>>> library >>>>> ... >>>>> >>> Why is this library not versioned in the usual manner? (E.g. >>> libtasn1.so.1, accompanied by a .so symlink pointing to the >>> "current" version for use by the normal linker environment.) >>> >> Sorry, this is my mistake. >> >> /usr/lib/libtasn1.so Volatile Symbolic link >> /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3 Volatile Symbolic link >> /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3.0.15 Volatile Shared library >> >> Spec will be changed accordingly. >> >> >>> I don't know whether there's a SAC Best Practice for bringing >>> the license terms of libraries to the notice of developers who >>> might wish to use those libraries. AFAICT this one is LGPL; >>> does that need to be mentioned anywhere? >>> >> I'll mention that in libtasn1 man page. >> >> Thanks >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >>> Mike. >>> > >
