Generally, we don't include license information in the manpage. For Opensolaris project, we ship a copyright file in each package, I think that will do.
--Irene On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:10 +0800, Jeff Cai wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 16:24 -0700, Mike Oliver wrote: > > Irene Huang wrote: > > > >> ... > > >> 4.2. Interfaces: > > >> Exported Interfaces > > >> Interface Classification Comments > > >> --------------- -------------- > > >> ----------------------- > > >> ... > > >> /usr/lib/libtasn1.so Volatile Shared > > >> library > > >> ... > > > > Why is this library not versioned in the usual manner? (E.g. > > libtasn1.so.1, accompanied by a .so symlink pointing to the > > "current" version for use by the normal linker environment.) > Sorry, this is my mistake. > > /usr/lib/libtasn1.so Volatile Symbolic link > /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3 Volatile Symbolic link > /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3.0.15 Volatile Shared library > > Spec will be changed accordingly. > > > > > I don't know whether there's a SAC Best Practice for bringing > > the license terms of libraries to the notice of developers who > > might wish to use those libraries. AFAICT this one is LGPL; > > does that need to be mentioned anywhere? > > I'll mention that in libtasn1 man page. > > Thanks > > Jeff > > > > > > Mike. >
