On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 03:09:28PM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > Nicolas Williams writes: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:57:25AM -0700, Michael Hunter wrote: > > > I didn't agree with your (?) request earlier in this thread to ARC that > > > interface as it seems like more of an impediment then necessary to the > > > integration of wireshark. But if this is the answer then that is > > > needed. > > > > I don't understand. Why can't we ship Wireshark with any plug-in > > interface (does it have one) marked as Volatile? How is that worse than > > not shipping it, or not shipping Wireshark at all? > > We're potentially creating fun for future project teams:
I meant, Volatile for folks outside the WOS, or preferably outside ON (i.e., dissector plug-ins would have to be integrated into Wireshark or into ON). Then anyone updating Wireshark in Solaris would be responsible for fixing an dissectors in ON-but-not-in-Wireshark that break.
