On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:22:01AM -0700, Michael Hunter wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:09:11 -0400 > Wyllys Ingersoll <Wyllys.Ingersoll at Sun.COM> wrote: > > I also don't see the logic behind forcing the wireshark > > project to address the missing functionality in snoop. > > I don't either. But I would like to see a statement about the > wireshark community and maintainers and how easy it is estimated to be > to get them to accept patches. Its not an architectural concern. But > the cost of long term maintenance should effect which of the two we put > effort into.
Or for us to simply ship any plug-ins not accepted by the Wireshark community.
