James Carlson wrote: > > (I'm actually not so concerned about this as I am with the disconnect > between snoop maintenance and wireshark. I want wireshark, but I also > want a commitment to it, rather than a drive-by integration. Is that > simply asking too much?) >
I'm planning on maintaining Wireshark in the sfw consolidation by keeping it up-to-date with the community releases. I do not currently plan on removing snoop from ON. If those who currently maintain snoop wish to redirect their efforts to making sure that wireshark protocol support is a proper superset of that in snoop and then EOF snoop, that's fine w/ me. Apparently, snoop has been placed in sustaining mode already. If no resources are available to do even that much, leaving snoop alone and declared Obsolete certainly won't set any precedents; much of our userland code is defacto in the same state. - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance barts at cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
