On Monday 10 November 2008 19:46:31 Dean Roehrich wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 04:54:19PM +0300, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote: > > jhf-1 > > Section 2.2 describes the release binding for the project. The answer to > > the question states that eclipse it is a Major release. Is that correct? > > > > Yes > > > > What is the delivery mechanism for this project? > > > > Through download page http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/ or through OS > > packaging systems (similar to IPS). > > > > Is it a Minor release of Solaris? > > > > I do not understand this question. > > I've found it's always safest to say "Minor", unless you do understand the > question. Solaris 9, Solaris 10, Solaris-whatever-comes-next -- those are > all "minor" releases. And all questions of "release binding" are with > respect to Solaris releases.
The release we will be integrating in is not known to me at the moment. So, Minor. > > I have no idea how "major" could ever be used. > > Now I'm sure the finer points will be explained to us... > > > jhf-4 > > > > Both, although SVR4 package name should not manifest itself through IPS, > > as I understand it. > > I think he means your package names should be SUNWeclipse and > SUNWeclipse-root (or SUNWeclipseu and SUNWeclipser), rather than simply > 'eclipse'. Actually the SUNW prefix is not required for IPS system. You can find packages like glassfishv2 or sunstudio - with no prefix. > > > mhm-1 > > > > I am not sure what "consolidation" means. > > He's asking, where do you plan to check-in this code? Are you planning to > check this into ON, SFW, Desktop....? > > > mhm-3 > > > > As I can see, many packages are named like this, including netbeans: > > http://pkg.opensolaris.org > > I've answered that above, but you also reference a package called 'j6dev'. > A closer inspection of pkg.opensolaris.org shows that package is SUNWj6dev, > not j6dev. Yes, this is my mistake - I mean SUNWj6dev. Shura. > > Dean
