Brian Utterback writes: > Okay, but 5.9.4 shipped 4 months ago. Granted it might have been a > little green at that point, which is why I thought 5.9.3 would have > been the logical choice.
I think that the exact version number may not necessarily be architecturally significant in this instance. As long as the upstream provider follows a rational numbering scheme, and we're not concerned with exposed volatile bits that may cause trouble, I think it'd be appropriate to say "autogen 5.9, or any completely-compatible dot release with minor version 5.9." -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
