David,
> I may have jumped the gun on this. Per this morning's PSARC meeting,
> Gary has not yet finished reviewing the updated spec. So, extending the
> timer to 1/30/2008.
Thanks.
> > Based on your comments, the project team has an updated spec.txt (v2)
> > at the material directory. Please see
> > http://sac.eng.sun.com/Archives/CaseLog/arc/PSARC/2008/021/material/spec_v2.txt
> >
I don't see the default values discussed in the updated
spec. IMO, these seem important to the user experience
and relevant to the case. When Solaris first installed,
what will occur if the Lid is closed, what is the LCD brightness,
what action does the power button have?
Perhaps parochically, I also don't see why the policy, which I
believe is implemented in HAL, should not just depend on PSARC/2008/034
Defining Workstation Owner Infrastructure. And thus this
case have a dependency to that one. Afterall, this/that is
exactly why 2008/034 was submitted. It seems to me implementing
your own /dev/console and authorization tests side step the
architecuture of allowing the Administrator to have control.
Finally perhaps a wording nit: "*Will consult with the audit
team to enable auditing." seems somewhat weak. Will meet
the Solaris Audit policy,
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/audit-policy
seem more appropriate.
Gary..
P.S. The schedule of 2008/034 is not architecturally relevant.
Feel free to add yourself to the interest list of
6650907 Implement PSARC/2008/034 Defining Workstation Owner Infrastructure
and have management escalate if you find the resourcing and
timing in conflict with other escalated project issues.
