Gary Winiger wrote: > David, > > >>I may have jumped the gun on this. Per this morning's PSARC meeting, >>Gary has not yet finished reviewing the updated spec. So, extending the >>timer to 1/30/2008. > > > Thanks. > > >>>Based on your comments, the project team has an updated spec.txt (v2) >>>at the material directory. Please see >>>http://sac.eng.sun.com/Archives/CaseLog/arc/PSARC/2008/021/material/spec_v2.txt >>> > > > I don't see the default values discussed in the updated > spec. IMO, these seem important to the user experience > and relevant to the case. When Solaris first installed, > what will occur if the Lid is closed, what is the LCD brightness, > what action does the power button have?
The LSARC GPM case handles the GUI which really sets the default action. Lid -- the default action on lid close is to do nothing. Power button -- the default action is to ask the user similiar to what happens now. It will display gnome-sys-suspend GUI when the power button is pressed. Brightness -- Nothing will happen, i.e. no change in brightness. > > Perhaps parochically, I also don't see why the policy, which I > believe is implemented in HAL, should not just depend on PSARC/2008/034 > Defining Workstation Owner Infrastructure. And thus this > case have a dependency to that one. Afterall, this/that is > exactly why 2008/034 was submitted. It seems to me implementing > your own /dev/console and authorization tests side step the > architecuture of allowing the Administrator to have control. > > Finally perhaps a wording nit: "*Will consult with the audit > team to enable auditing." seems somewhat weak. Will meet > the Solaris Audit policy, > http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/audit-policy > seem more appropriate. Ok, I will change the wording. > > Gary.. > P.S. The schedule of 2008/034 is not architecturally relevant. > Feel free to add yourself to the interest list of > 6650907 Implement PSARC/2008/034 Defining Workstation Owner Infrastructure > and have management escalate if you find the resourcing and > timing in conflict with other escalated project issues. > When this project was started, PSARC/2008/034 Defining Workstation Owner Infrastructure wasn't on the horizon at all. I'll contact you separately about your case plans. Phi
