> If there isn't consider the recent ones derailed or waiting
> need spec until the big picture becomes available. I trust
> the case owner will choose between derail and waiting need
> spec and update the IAMs appropriately. If there is a reason,
> please state it. Perhaps it's to meet some critical business
> need, then please group those together and say what the need
> may be.
The big picture is that the components delivered under /usr/sfw should
instead be delivered in their "expected" locations per
PSARC 2005/185 Enabling serendipitous discovery
and other related cases including
PSARC 2007/047 /usr/gnu
The intent is to move the existing components that are under /usr/sfw
and as I mentioned in an earlier email, there hasn't been an overall
case that covers the whole wad due to time constraints and in my
opinion, making progress on individual components made sense while
waiting for a case that covers the rest.
dsc