> The big picture is that the components delivered under /usr/sfw should
> instead be delivered in their "expected" locations per
>
> PSARC 2005/185 Enabling serendipitous discovery
I guessed that. And 30,000 closed self reviews doesn't make
sense to me. Are there really 30K thing in the /usr/sfw tree
today?
> and other related cases including
>
> PSARC 2007/047 /usr/gnu
>
> The intent is to move the existing components that are under /usr/sfw
> and as I mentioned in an earlier email, there hasn't been an overall
> case that covers the whole wad due to time constraints and in my
> opinion, making progress on individual components made sense while
> waiting for a case that covers the rest.
I guess we're having email skew, I'll shut up for a while
and work on my "Day Job". I think I've made my point of seeing
the forrest rather than the trees.
Gary..
