Danek Duvall <danek.duvall at sun.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 06:50:06PM -0400, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 15:15 -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
> > > There are three executables: 7z, 7za, and 7zr. The first is the
> > > most general. It supports multiple archive and compression
> > > formats
> > > through shared-object plugins. 7za does not use any plugins, and
> > > hence supports fewer formats. 7zr is even further reduced,
> > > supporting only the 7z archive and compression formats.
> > ...
> > > For the purposes of this ARC case, however, only the 7z archive
> > > format and LZMA compression algorithms are supported. Bzip2, gzip,
> > > zip, rar, tar, cpio, and its myriad other capabilities will likely
> > > be present, but their presence will not be guaranteed on an ongoing
> > > basis.
> >
> > Given this caveat, why not make "7zr" the "Committed" variant and have
> > 7z and 7za be "Uncommitted"?
>
> I want to commit to the executable name which most people expect (and is
> thus the least likely to disappear from upstream), and I believe that the
> more common commandline invocation is 7z. If anyone has data to the
> contrary, I'm more than happy to switch the stability classifications.
I believe 7z is more common. I did decide to use the option -7z for star
when I added support for p7zip to star in spring.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
